Home
Best
Texans
Volunteer
Logout
Archive
Ask a Question!
Client Login
Contact Us
FAQ
Guestbook
Home
Legal
Links
Networks
Sponsors
Team Members
Volunteer

Drawing the Line

Submitted by Sam Northshield, 01/1999. This article by Allen Stenger.

Show that given any finite set of points P1, P1, ..., Pn in the plane (with n>1), either all the points lie on the same line, or there is a pair Pi, Pj such that the line through Pi and Pj meets no other point of the set.

This problem seems intuitively obvious and you probably think it's easy to solve, but....

Hint 1

If you work out some examples, you will see that there are many lines that contain only two points, but how can you prove in general that there is at least one? In a sense we have an "embarrassment of riches," with many more lines than we actually need. Think of some way to distinguish one of the two-point lines (some unique property that it has) and then prove that conversely any line with this special property is a two-point line.

Hint 2

Let S be the set of lines that go through at least two of the given points. Then the set S is finite. Consider the set of pairs (L, Pi), where L is in S, and Pi is one of the given points that does not lie on L. There are only finitely many such pairs. Choose one such pair for which the distance between L and Pi is as small as possible. Then L is our "distinguished" line; show that L cannot contain more than two points.

Hint 3

See the figure. We can renumber the points if needed such that P1 is the point nearest to L. Write Q for the point on L closest to P1. Suppose L does not have the desired property, and so there are at least three points on L. Then at least two of them are on the same side of Q. We can renumber these two points if needed so they are P2 and P3 (note that P2 might coincide with Q). Then draw the line through P1 and P3. Show that P2 is nearer to the new line than P1 is to L, which contradicts the choice of P1 and L.

the line L and three points on it

The Rest of the Solution

See the figure. We have that P2B is shorter than P2A because the former is one side and the latter is the hypotenuse of a right triangle. We have that P2A either coincides with QP1 or is shorter than it because they are corresponding sides of the similar triangles P3P2A and P3QP1.

construction showing L is not the nearest line

References

  • Our solution comes from the book Proofs from the Book, 2nd edition, by Martin Aigner and Günter M. Ziegler, Springer-Verlag, 2001. This result is known as the Sylvester-Gallai theorem; our proof is due to L. M. Kelly and comes from Chapter 8 of the book. There is a completely different proof in Chapter 10, based on Euler's formula for polyhedra.

© MathNerds TM. All Rights Reserved.
Email the Webmaster